• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • BioMedical Journal Articles
    • Biomed Full Text Articles
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • BioMedical Journal Articles
    • Biomed Full Text Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Window screening, ceilings and closed eaves as sustainable ways to control malaria in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Fulltext.pdf (810.5Kb)
    Abstract.pdf (5.989Kb)
    Date
    2009-09-29
    Author
    Ogoma, SB
    Kannady, K
    Sikulu, M
    Chaki, PP
    Govella, NJ
    Mukabana, WR
    Killeen, GF
    Type
    Journal Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Malaria transmission in Africa occurs predominantly inside houses where the primary vectors prefer to feed. Human preference and investment in blocking of specific entry points for mosquitoes into houses was evaluated and compared with known entry point preferences of the mosquitoes themselves. Methods Cross-sectional household surveys were conducted in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania to estimate usage levels of available options for house proofing against mosquito entry, namely window screens, ceilings and blocking of eaves. These surveys also enabled evaluation of household expenditure on screens and ceilings and the motivation behind their installation. Results Over three quarters (82.8%) of the 579 houses surveyed in Dar es Salaam had window screens, while almost half (48.9%) had ceilings. Prevention of mosquito entry was cited as a reason for installation of window screens and ceilings by 91.4% (394/431) and 55.7% (127/228) of respondents, respectively, but prevention of malaria was rarely cited (4.3%, 22/508). The median cost of window screens was between US $ 21-30 while that of ceilings was between US $301-400. The market value of insecticide-treated nets, window screening and ceilings currently in use in the city was estimated as 2, 5 and 42 million US$. More than three quarters of the respondents that lacked them said it was too expensive to install ceilings (82.2%) or window screens (75.5%). Conclusion High coverage and spending on screens and ceilings implies that these techniques are highly acceptable and excellent uptake can be achieved in urban settings like Dar es Salaam. Effective models for promotion and subsidization should be developed and evaluated, particularly for installation of ceilings that prevent entry via the eaves, which are the most important entry point for mosquitoes that cause malaria, a variety of neglected tropical diseases and the nuisance which motivates uptake.
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-221
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/14743
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19785779
    Citation
    Malaria Journal. 2009 Sep 29;8(1):221
    Rights Holder
    Sheila B Ogoma et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
    Collections
    • Biomed Full Text Articles [201]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback