Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKibet, Staline
dc.contributor.authorNyangito, Moses
dc.contributor.authorLaban, Mac O
dc.contributor.authorKenfack, David
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-01T05:07:13Z
dc.date.available2021-09-01T05:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationKibet S, Nyangito, Moses M, MacOpiyo L, Kenfack D. "Tracing innovation pathways in the management of natural and social capital on Laikipia Maasai Group Ranches, Kenya." Pastoralism. 2016;6(1):16.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13570-016-0063-z.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/155386
dc.description.abstractGroup ranches (GRs) were established in Kenya in the 1960s and 1970s; their objectives included the increase of pastoral land productivity and the control of land degradation. Since their establishment, GRs have evolved and new trends have emerged in resource management with significant impact on socio-ecological systems (SESs). Little is known about these changes on the GRs in Laikipia County. The central thesis for this study was that GRlevel- driven and/or collective action innovations are socio-ecologically more resilient compared to household/individual-level strategies. This study investigated emerging innovations, their drivers and perceived and felt impacts, using Il Motiok GR as a case study. Tools used included semi-structured interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions and second order cybernetics. Qualitative analysis using SPSS software was done. The results showed that emerging innovations could be divided into either household/individual- or community-level-driven processes. Some of the innovations in natural capital management included the trading of grazing rights, expansion of traditional enclosures, adoption of ‘new’ livestock species and/or breeds, and crop cultivation. Household-level-driven innovations were influenced by wealth status, age and level of education. Economic returns and to some extent the greater good influenced community-driven initiatives. Formal groupings such as self-help groups and business associations were replacing declining traditional social networks based on clans and age sets/groups. Climate change, development agencies, cultural and technological change and neighborhood social learning are perceived as having inspired the innovations. Innovations that fragmented natural and social capital were inclined to limit socio-ecological resilience. Implementation of new interventions among communities must factor in the possibilities of transformation and/or emergence of new innovations beyond those initially conceptualized as implementation progresses. Supportive policies that recognize the increasing complexity of common property use are needed to address emerging ‘new’ land use changes. Furthermore, there is need to nurture emergent promising innovations and stop those considered detrimental to the sustainability of SESs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectGroup ranches, Innovations, Laikipia, Pastoralists, Socio-ecological system, Resilienceen_US
dc.titleTracing Innovation Pathways in the Management of Natural and Social Capital on Laikipia Maasai Group Ranches, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States