dc.description.abstract | The main objective of the assessment was to assess the status of the M&E system in the
Ministry of Planning in the Federal Government of Somalia. Specifically, the study wanted to
establish: the extent to which the M&E system in the Ministry of Planning in the Federal
Government of Somalia compared with the established M&E standards, the gaps/challenges
of the M&E system and the contribution of the M&E system to programme improvement.
The study adopted the UNAIDS (2009) framework together with the Monitoring and
Evaluation Systems Strengthening Tool criteria on M&E system assessment. The study
employed convenient sampling technique to solicit data from personnel in the Ministry of
Planning in the Federal Government of Somalia. To collect comprehensive data, the
assessment applied structured questionnaires, key informant interview guide and document
reviews. The study generated both quantitative and qualitative data. Excel Spreadsheet and
SPSS version 24 were applied in the analysis of quantitative data, while Nvivo was applied to
analyze qualitative data. Findings of the study established that the status of the M&E system
for the Ministry of Planning in the Federal Government of Somalia scored 53% out of a
possible 100%. This score represents a computed gap of 47%. The individual components
had different scores, indicating that while some components were largely compliant others
were not. For instance, Organizational structure with monitoring and evaluation functions had
the highest compliance (58%), which was attributed to dedicated M&E unit with clearly
outlined responsibilities compared to data demand and use (49%). This suggests that while
efforts have been made by the ministry of planning to institutionalize monitoring and
evaluation in the day-to-day operations, there are still gaps in the M&E system. The
assessment recommends the need to integrate multisectoral plans into the M&E plan in
addition to employing adequate and qualified workforce to undertake M&E activities and
involve them in decision-making. | en_US |