Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOgero, Morris
dc.contributor.authorNdiritu, John
dc.contributor.authorSarguta, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorTuti, Timothy
dc.contributor.authorAkech, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-10T09:24:01Z
dc.date.available2023-11-10T09:24:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationOgero M, Ndiritu J, Sarguta R, Tuti T, Akech S. Pediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource-limited settings: An external validation study. Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 27;6(8):e1433. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1433. PMID: 37645032; PMCID: PMC10460931.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37645032/
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/163943
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims: Prognostic models provide evidence-based predictions and estimates of future outcomes, facilitating decision-making, patient care, and research. A few of these models have been externally validated, leading to uncertain reliability and generalizability. This study aims to externally validate four models to assess their transferability and usefulness in clinical practice. The models include the respiratory index of severity in children (RISC)-Malawi model and three other models by Lowlavaar et al. Methods: The study used data from the Clinical Information Network (CIN) to validate the four models where the primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. 163,329 patients met eligibility criteria. Missing data were imputed, and the logistic function was used to compute predicted risk of in-hospital mortality. Models' discriminatory ability and calibration were determined using area under the curve (AUC), calibration slope, and intercept. Results: The RISC-Malawi model had 50,669 pneumonia patients who met the eligibility criteria, of which the case-fatality ratio was 4406 (8.7%). Its AUC was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.77-0.78), whereas the calibration slope was 1.04 (95% CI: 1.00 -1.06), and calibration intercept was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84). Regarding the external validation of Lowlavaar et al. models, 10,782 eligible patients were included, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 5.3%. The primary model's AUC was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.77), the calibration slope was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84), and the calibration intercept was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.28-0.46). All models markedly underestimated the risk of mortality. Conclusion: All externally validated models exhibited either underestimation or overestimation of the risk as judged from calibration statistics. Hence, applying these models with confidence in settings other than their original development context may not be advisable. Our findings strongly suggest the need for recalibrating these model to enhance their generalizability.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectepidemiology; model external validation; pediatrics and adolescent medicine.en_US
dc.titlePediatric prognostic models predicting inhospital child mortality in resource-limited settings: An external validation studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States