• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Digitization Phase 4: Projects & Thesis
    • Final
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Digitization Phase 4: Projects & Thesis
    • Final
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Is Power Sharing a Feasible Alternative to the Pursuit of Peace in Contested Elections: a Comparative Analysis of Kenya and Zimbabwe

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Is Power Sharing a Feasible Alternative to the Pursuit of Peace in Contested Elections a Comparative Analysis of Kenya and Zimbabwe.pdf (5.627Mb)
    Date
    2012
    Author
    Kaburia, Edward K
    Type
    Project
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Power-sharing governments are common ingredients of peace making and peace building efforts. Power-sharing guarantees the participation of representatives of significant groups in political decision making especially in the executive as well as in the legislature, judiciary, police and army. By dividing power among rival groups during contested elestions, powersharing reduces the danger that one party will become dominant and threaten the security of others. One way of understanding power-sharing is in terms of conflict management. The main function of power-sharing in this discourse is to end violence and not necessarily to build democracy. There have been serious critiques with regard to the feasibility or the desirability of powersharing. This study critically aims at looking at the meaning and evolution of the powersharing agreements, underpinning aims and strategies of their use for recovery of states experiencing conflict due to contested elections, the key role they play, and their challenges and shortcomings in the recovery of conflicting societies. In other words, this study will research on the feasibility of power-sharing in governments as a means of fostering longlasting peace in states experiencing conflict due to contested elections. Qualitative data collection and analysis were used for this dissertation. Qualitative data is the most applicable to this study because it gathers rich data in the form of the attitudes, feelings, and motivations of the subjects. The attitudes, feelings, and emotions of the subjects can yield in-depth and rich answers to the research objectives. In-depth interviews were carried out using an interview guide to collect the qualitative data. These individual interviews are semistructured in the sense that a number of prescribed or seed questions were asked. Once a seed question is asked, the interviews assume a discussion form, with the interviewee directing the conversation with a number of follow-up questions to uncover key contextual information or to elaborate on important topics.
    URI
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/165585
    Publisher
    UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI
    Collections
    • Final [891]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback