dc.description.abstract | The multiparty political system plays a key role peace process in South Sudan, influencing the
efficacy of legal, policy, and institutional frameworks in addressing peace-building challenges and
contributing to democratic governance. This study investigates into the connection between
multipartism and the South Sudan peace process, aiming to elucidate the complexities, challenges,
and opportunities inherent in this relationship. Drawing from a range of academic works, policy
documents, and empirical data, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of how multiparty
politics impacts peace-building efforts in South Sudan. It highlights the strengths and weaknesses
of existing legal and institutional frameworks in addressing peace-building challenges, including
issues of political polarization, inclusivity, and power-sharing. The study also explores the role of
multiparty politics in deepening democratic governance in South Sudan, exploring how it affects
political participation, accountability, and transparency. By employing theoretical frameworks
such as Lijphart's consociational democracy and Mainwaring's analysis of presidentialism and
multipartism, the study offers insights into the complexities of multiparty dynamics in conflictaffected
contexts. Through qualitative research methods including interviews and document
analysis, this study identifies gaps, challenges, and opportunities for enhancing the influences of
multipartism on the South Sudan peace process. It presents practical recommendations for
policymakers, stakeholders, and peacebuilders to leverage the positive aspects of multiparty
politics while addressing its potential drawbacks in peace-building endeavors. Overall, this study
contributes to broader discourse on peace-building, governance, and political dynamics on
conflict-affected regions, providing valuable insights and recommendations for advancing
sustainable peace and democratic governance in South Sudan. | en_US |