dc.description.abstract | This study sought to examine the viability of incorporation of Mediation into the University of
Nairobi’s Student Disciplinary Procedures and Processes. The study was underpinned by
Conflict theory which relied on the works of Karl Marx, General System theory by Ludwig
Von Bertalanffy and Edward Freeman’s Stakeholder theory. The study employed critical
document review approach. To this end, the study, examined the university’s historical
background on student disciplinary and the current Student’s Code of Conduct, which outlines
student disciplinary processes and procedures. Additionally, the study reviewed cases filed in
court with regards to the University of Nairobi’s student disciplinary procedures and processes,
which poses reputational and financial risks. A case on why Mediation is the preferred
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanism was made, taking into account, the
Universities Act, 2012 encourages amicable resolution of disputes and the University of
Nairobi Students’ Code of Conduct has empowered its disciplinary panels to make any changes
necessary to make disciplinary processes effective. Therefore, providing the legislative
foundation for the University to incorporate Mediation into its student Disciplinary Processes
and Procedures Comparative study on how the university may incorporate mediation were
made, by examining how the University of Warwick1 and Oriel College-Oxford2 University
have incorporated it. Both institutions were chosen for their robust student Mediation
Frameworks and processes. The study appreciated that the nature violations of Codes of
Conduct by students has evolved and recommended that Mediation is incorporated into the
University of Nairobi Students’ Disciplinary Procedures and Processes. Recommendations on
how the university may incorporate mediation were made, by examining how the University
of Warwick and Oriel College-Oxford University have incorporated it. | en_US |