| dc.description.abstract | Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have become essential in enhancing financial accessibility and fostering socioeconomic activities. They play a pivotal role in promoting financial inclusion, particularly in developing countries such as Kenya. These institutions offer financial services to underserved groups, particularly low-income families, small businesses, and rural entrepreneurs who lack access to traditional banking systems. However, the sustainability of MFIs in Kenya is increasingly being scrutinized due to the evolving financial environment and regulatory challenges. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore how regulatory frameworks contribute to the sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs)in Kenya. The study utilized a descriptive research design, which is well-suited for examining and detailing the regulatory frameworks governing MFIs in Kenya and their impact on sustainability. By relying on secondary data sources, the study aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the regulatory impacts on MFIs. A census survey design was employed, covering all 20 licensed microfinance institutions in Kenya due to the relatively small population size. The study utilized both descriptive and inferential statistics to analyze the relationship between regulatory frameworks and the sustainability of MFIs. Statistical tools, including SPSS, were used to generate frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations. The study developed a secondary data collection form for analysis where data from all 20MFIs over a span of 5 years was gathered and analyzed. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed a strong, positive and significant relationship between capital adequacy, liquidity management, consumer protection, risk management policies, governance structure, socio economic environment and technology adoption on MFI sustainability. Based on the findings, it can be inferred that the government should explore ways to ensure that all MFIs operating in Kenya are regulated to establish an inclusive regulatory framework. By making appropriate provisions for non-performing loans in financial statements, organizations can enhance their collection mechanisms and exercise due diligence when approving loans. This approach not only makes borrowers more responsible but also contributes to the sustainability of the organization. Regulatory frameworks should be advocated in every organization to improve service delivery. Compliance with regulatory requirements such as reporting standards and governance practices, can be a significant burden for MFIs, including the submission of regular reports on their financial performance, risk exposures, and governance structures. Based on the findings, the study recommends that the government should tighten regulations governing MFIs operations in Kenya to ensure a comprehensive regulatory framework. Additionally, the government should assist MFIs by creating a fund to lend to institutions willing to transform but lacking capital, as it is evident that regulating is expensive. However, future research could incorporate both primary and secondary data collection. Additionally ,a longitudinal study would likely yield complementary outcomes to those of this study. | en_US |