Core states in regional conflict resolution : a critical analysis of kenya's role in the Southern Sudan peace process'

Abstract

This study examines the motivation for Kenya's involvement in the region's conflicts over the years and the role it plays in the management of these conflicts. The study answers key questions that have eluded direct answers and that are pertinent in the study of Kenya's diplomacy of conflict management. That is, the factors conditioning Kenya to manage and resolve the conflict in Southern Sudan and the role and motivation for Kenya's consistent insistence on resolving the conflict The study puts in context three key variables as motivators for Kenya's involvement in resolving and managing the Sudan conflict upon which, thematic hypotheses are based, that is, economic, security, hegemonic and power variables as intrinsic national interests. The study shows that, economic considerations are an important motivator for Kenya to continually involve itself in managing the conflict in Southern Sudan. The study also demonstrates that security is a major factor for Kenya's involvement in managing/resolving the conflict. With a direct effect on internal (in) security exacerbated by porous borders and proliferation of small arms used in committing crimes within the country. The study aptly draws the connection between terrorism, insecurity and its effects on Kenya's tourism industry as a direct security and economic problem. Lastly, the study contextualizes the interrelationship between hegemony and conflict management as a responsibility of states in the region, but more so, that of the core state - Kenya in this case. Hegemony is argued against the backdrop of challenges from Uganda and Tanzania. The study also underscores the importance and need of/for peace building in the conflict management process as a safety net for preventing resurgence of conflict.