• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Responses of common bean (phaseols vulgaris l.) cultivars to beanflies(diptera:agromyzidae)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full Text (6.131Mb)
    Date
    1988
    Author
    Nderitu, JH
    Type
    Thesis
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    The population patterns and behaviour of the immature stages and the adults of two species of Ophiomyia, namely Opbiomyia spencerella Greathead and Ophiomyia phaseoli Tryon on seven selected cultivars of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were studied under field conditions with a view to determining the esistance/susceptibility of the cultivars to infestation of beanfly. The method adopted for evaluating resistance/ susceptibility of the cultivars involved exposing growing bean plants to natural beanfly populations in the field and recording the number of leaf punctures, eggs, larvae, pupae/puparia, and percent infested plants, percent plant mortality and damage scores of representative sample for each cultivar. On the basis of levels of infestation and damage, Glp 1004 and Glp x-92 appeared to have some resistance while Glp 2, Glp 24, Glp 585, Glp x-1127(a) and Mexican 142 appeared to be susceptible. However, seasonal differences in the response of the cultivars to beanfly infestation tended to obscure this finding. The anomally in the results was attributed to differences in the size of the initial population of beanfly in the vicinity of the bean crop, being highest in the noncropping season of 1985 and lowest in long rains of 1985. In cases of high beanfly infestation all the bean cultivars, including those that had shown signs of resistance under moderate infestation, were severely damaged. Thus there were difficulties in having a uniform beanfly infestation of sufficient level to which the cultivars were subjected during the growing period. However,natural populations of beanfly on beans planted in a single planting in the late part of the cropping season or the beginning of noncropping season was sufficient to cause observable damage symptoms, which could be reliably used as parameters for resistance. Successive plantings of bean cultivars in the middle part of cropping season could also produce a beanfly population sufficiently high for screening purposes. Under moderate field infestation, determination of percent plant mortality due to Q. spencerella, stem damage scores due to O. phaseoli and the number of pupae/puparia were more reliable indices of resistance/susceptibilty than the number of beanfly leaf punctures, eggs or larvae as parameters for resistance measurement.
    URI
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/21601
    Citation
    DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY(Zoology)
    Publisher
    University of Dar-es-Salaam
    Collections
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM) [3095]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback