• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Field trial of a synthetic tsetse-repellent technology developed for the control of bovine trypanosomosis in Kenya.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract-Field trial.pdf (8.546Kb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Bett, B
    Randolph, TF
    Irungu, P
    Nyamwaro, SO
    Kitala, P
    Gathuma, J,
    Grace, D
    Vale, G
    Hargrove, J
    McDermott, J
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    We conducted a field trial among Maasai cattle-keepers in Nkuruman and Nkineji areas of Kenya to evaluate the effectiveness of a synthetic tsetse-repellent technology developed for the control of trypanosomosis in cattle. The technology was a repellent (2-methoxy 4-methylphenol) emitted from dispensers attached to collars worn by cattle. Treatment was allocated at the herd level to ensure adequate protection of all the animals in a herd, with measurements of effectiveness conducted at the individual-animal level. The trial began in April 2005 and ran for 16 months including a baseline phase of 4 months. We recruited 12 herds in each area using a restricted random-sampling technique and distributed them equally into intervention (repellent) and control groups. Sample size was determined using a formal power calculation. Effectiveness or minimal worthwhile difference was defined as a 50% reduction in the incidence of trypanosome infection in the treated versus control group (effectiveness below which the technology was considered by experts as not viable compared to existing control techniques). All the animals in the recruited herds were screened monthly (buffy-coat technique) for trypanosome infections. The analysis followed the principle of intention-to-treat by which subjects are analysed according to their initial treatment assignment, regardless of the mechanical performance of the device. Crude and adjusted effects of the technology were 23% (p<0.001) and 18% (p=0.08) reduction in the infection incidence in the treatment compared to the control groups, respectively. The impact of the technology estimated in this study did not achieve the threshold of 50% reduction in the trypanosome infection incidence set a priori to indicate effectiveness (p<0.001). We therefore concluded that the prototype repellent technology package was not sufficiently effective in reducing trypanosome infection incidence under natural tsetse challenge to merit commercial development.
    URI
    http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20980070
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/34883
    Citation
    Bett B, Randolph TF, Irungu P, Nyamwaro SO, Kitala P, Gathuma J, Grace D, Vale G, Hargrove J, McDermott J Field trial of a synthetic tsetse-repellent technology developed for the control of bovine trypanosomosis in Kenya., Preventive Veterinary Medicine [2010, 97(3-4):220-227]
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi,
    Collections
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM) [5481]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback