• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin in treating bacterial corneal ulcers. Ciprofloxacin Bacterial Keratitis Study Group

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract.pdf (184.0Kb)
    Date
    1996-11
    Author
    Hyndiuk, RA
    Eiferman, RA
    Caldwell, DR
    Rosenwasser, GO
    Santos, CI
    Katz, HR
    Badrinath, SS
    Reddy, MK
    Adenis, JP
    Klauss, V
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% (Ciloxan) with a standard therapy regimen (fortified tobramycin, 1.3%-cefazolin, 5.0%) for treating bacterial corneal ulcers. METHODS: This randomized, parallel group, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted in 324 patients at 28 centers in the United States, Europe, and India. Patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 160 to ciprofloxacin and 164 to fortified tobramycin-cefazolin. Positive microbiologic cultures were obtained in 188 (58%) of 324 patients. Of these, 176 patients met protocol criteria and were evaluated for treatment efficacy: 82 in the ciprofloxacin group and 94 in the standard therapy group. The dosing schedule for both treatment groups was 1 to 2 drops of the first study medication (ciprofloxacin or fortified tobramycin) every 30 minutes for 6 hours, then hourly for the remainder of day 1; 1 to 2 drops every hour on days 2 and 3; 1 to 2 drops every 2 hours on days 4 and 5, followed by 1 to 2 drops every 4 hours on days 6 to 14. The second medication (ciprofloxacin or cefazolin) was instilled 5 to 15 minutes after the first drug, following the same dosing frequency. Physician's judgment of clinical success, cure rate, changes in ocular sings, and symptoms and the rate of treatment failures were the primary efficacy criteria. RESULTS: Topical ciprofloxacin monotherapy is equivalent clinically and statistically to the standard therapy regimen of fortified antibiotics. No statistically significant treatment differences were found between ciprofloxacin (91.5%) and standard therapy (86.2%) in terms of overall clinical efficacy (P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were noted in resolution of the clinical signs and symptoms (P > 0.08) or the time to cure (P = 0.55). The incidence of treatment failures was less in the ciprofloxacin group (8.5%) compared with the standard therapy group (13.8%). Significantly fewer patients treated with ciprofloxacin reported discomfort than did patients treated with the standard therapy regimen (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.3% monotherapy is equivalent clinically and statistically to standard therapy (fortified tobramycin-cefazolin) for the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers and produces significantly less discomfort.
    URI
    http://hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/8942881
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/35574
    Citation
    Ophthalmology. 1996 Nov;103(11):1854-62; discussion 1862-3.
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
     
    College of Health Sciences,University of Nairobi
     
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) [10415]
    • Theses & Dissertations [241]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback