• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Conference/ Workshop/ Seminar/ Proceedings
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Conference/ Workshop/ Seminar/ Proceedings
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Boda-bodas Rule: the Poverty and Inequality Implications of Non-farm Activities in Western Kenya

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2006-10
    Author
    Lay, Jann
    Michuki, George
    Mahmoud, Toman Omar
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Several reasons have been advanced for income diversification into non-farm activities among rural households in Sub-Saharan Africa. Broadly, one may classify diversification behavior as ‘survival-led' or ‘opportunity-led'. Poor rural households with low asset endowments will embrace multiple livelihoods to ensure survival. At the same time, richer rural households with higher asset endowments will choose to diversify their livelihoods to maximize returns to their assets. The existence of these two types of non-agricultural activities implies a U-shaped relationship between the share of income derived from non-farm activities and household wealth (and accordingly total household income). According to this view on non-farm activities, the poverty and distributional impact of non-farm activities should be ambiguous: ‘Survival-led' engagement in non-farm activities should be inequality decreasing through increasing the incomes of the poorer parts of the population and hence reduce poverty. ‘Opportunity-led' diversification however would increase inequality and have a minor effect on poverty, as it may be confined to non-poor households. Some authors have pointed to this ambiguity, but the literature has so far not explicitly addressed the relationship between different diversification strategies, on the one hand, and poverty and distributional outcomes, on the other. In this paper, we first attempt to confirm empirically that diversification into non-farm income can be ‘survival‘ or ‘opportunity' driven. We estimate a choice model where we allow individuals to choose between staying in agriculture and the two types of non-farm diversification using data from a household survey conducted by the authors in Kakamega district in Western Kenya. Our empirical findings seem to confirm the existence of ‘survival-led' and ‘opportunity-led' diversification. We find the poverty and inequality implications of the differently motivated diversification strategies to correspond to the expected patterns.
    URI
    http://www.tropentag.de/2006/abstracts/links/Lay_t7dQbMCg.php
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/39155
    Citation
    Lay Jann, Michuki George, Mahmoud Toman Omar, Boda-bodas Rule: the Poverty and Inequality Implications of Non-farm Activities in Western Kenya, Tropentag 2006, October 11 - 13, Bonn, Germany
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
     
    Institute of Development Studies
     
    Subject
    Income diversification, inequality, nonfarm activities, poverty
    Collections
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM) [2584]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback