• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Engaging diverse communities participating in clinical trials: case examples from across Africa.

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Nyika, A
    Chilengi, R
    Ishengoma, D
    Mtenga, S
    Thera, MA
    Sissoko, MS
    Lusingu, J
    Tiono, AB
    Doumbo, O
    Sirima, SB
    Lemnge, M
    Kilama, W
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    BACKGROUND :In the advent of increasing international collaborative research involving participants drawn from populations with diverse cultural backgrounds, community engagement becomes very critical for the smooth conduction of the research. The African Malaria Network Trust (AMANET) is a pan-African non-governmental organization that sponsors and technically supports malaria vaccine trials in various African countries. CASE DESCRIPTION: AMANET sponsored phase Ib or IIb clinical trials of several malaria vaccine candidates in various Africa countries. In Burkina Faso, Mali and Tanzania trials of the merozoite surface protein 3 -- in its Long Synthetic Peptide configuration (MSP3 LSP) -- were conducted. In Mali, the apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) was tested, while a hybrid of glutamate rich protein (GLURP) and MSP3 (GMZ2) was tested in Gabon. AMANET recognizes the importance of engaging with the communities from which trial participants are drawn, hence community engagement was given priority in all project activities conducted in the various countries. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Existing local social systems were used to engage the communities from which clinical trial participants were drawn. This article focuses on community engagement activities employed at various AMANET-supported clinical trial sites in different countries, highlighting subtle differences in the approaches used. The paper also gives some general pros and cons of community engagement. CONCLUSIONS: Community engagement enables two-way sharing of accurate information and ideas between researchers and researched communities, which helps to create an environment conducive to smooth research activities with enhanced sense of research ownership by the communities.
    URI
    http://hinari-gw.who.int/whalecomwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/whalecom0/pubmed/20346126
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/41261
    Citation
    Nyika A, Chilengi R, Ishengoma D, Mtenga S, Thera MA, Sissoko MS, Lusingu J, Tiono AB, Doumbo O, Sirima SB, Lemnge M, Kilama W;Malar J. 2010 Mar 26;9:86
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi,
     
    College of Health Sciences,
     
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) [10418]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback