• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract.pdf (208.1Kb)
    Full Text (250.8Kb)
    Date
    2013-12-01
    Author
    Forman, Lisa
    Ooms, Gorik
    Chapman, Audrey
    Friedman, Eric
    WARIS, ATTIYA
    Lamprea, Everaldo
    Mulumba, Moses
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Background Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health’s contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, which links provision of health services to available resources, permitting states to deny even basic levels of health coverage domestically and allowing international assistance for health to remain entirely discretionary. Discussion To prevent progressive realization from undermining both domestic and international responsibilities towards health, international human rights law institutions developed the idea of non-derogable “minimum core” obligations to provide essential health services. While minimum core obligations have enjoyed some uptake in human rights practice and scholarship, their definition in international law fails to specify which health services should fall within their scope, or to specify wealthy country obligations to assist poorer countries. These definitional gaps undercut the capacity of minimum core obligations to protect essential health needs against inaction, austerity and illegitimate trade-offs in both domestic and global action. If the right to health is to effectively advance essential global health needs in these contexts, weaknesses within the minimum core concept must be resolved through innovative research on social, political and legal conceptualizations of essential health needs. Summary We believe that if the minimum core concept is strengthened in these ways, it will produce a more feasible and grounded conception of legally prioritized health needs that could assist in advancing health equity, including by providing a framework rooted in legal obligations to guide the formulation of new health development goals, providing a baseline of essential health services to be protected as a matter of right against governmental claims of scarcity and inadequate international assistance, and empowering civil society to claim fulfillment of their essential health needs from domestic and global decision-makers.
    URI
    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/13/48
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/64912
    Citation
    BMC International Health and Human Rights 2013, 13:48 (1 December 2013)
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) [10418]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback