• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Usage of community-based chloroquine treatment for malaria in Saradidi, Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract.pdf (9.925Kb)
    Date
    1987-04
    Author
    Kaseje, DC
    Spencer, HC
    Sempebwa, EK
    Type
    Article
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    A survey was done in June 1983 in Saradidi, Kenya, one year after the inception of a community-based malaria control programme to determine if people were obtaining malaria treatment from volunteer village health helpers (VHH's) chosen by the community. Ten of 36 villages were randomly chosen. From these ten villages, 100 households were randomly selected and 222 people ten years of age or more were interviewed; 113 (50.9%) had a history of malaria in the previous two weeks and 82 (72.6% of 113) had taken medicine for malaria in that period. Of these 82, 51.2% obtained drug from the VHH, 28% purchased it from a shop, 12.2% from a health facility, 4.9% from family members and 3.7% from a private practitioner or a shop outside Saradidi. Reasons given for not obtaining treatment from the VHH's among the 40 people who went elsewhere for treatment included: the VHH was not at home when needed (35%); the VHH had no drugs (22.5%); the patient was too sick for the VHH to treat (10%); had drugs already in the home (10%); 'not registered' with VHH (10%); VHH 'no good' (7.5%); and more 'convenient' to go elsewhere (5%). Similar results found on questioning the mother were obtained for 103 children under nine years old in these households; 67 (65.0%) children had a history of malaria in the previous two weeks and 59 (88.1%) of these 67 children had received antimalarial treatment. The VHH was the principal source of treatment (50.8% of 59), followed by health facilities (20.3%) and shops (18.6%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    URI
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3689031
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/65195
    Citation
    Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987 Apr;81 Suppl 1:111-5.
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) [10418]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback