• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment & Design (FEng / FBD)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment & Design (FEng / FBD)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Loss reduction and voltage profile improvement by optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation (DG) using a hybrid of genetic algorithm (GA) and improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (4.658Mb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Kilonzi, Charles J
    Type
    Thesis; en_US
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Though several algorithms for optimizing DG location and size in a power system network with the aim of reducing system power losses and improving voltage profile have already been proposed, they still suffer from several drawbacks. As a result much can be done in coming up with new algorithms or improving the already existing ones so as to address this important issue more efficiently and effectively. Majority of the proposed algorithms have emphasized on real power losses only in their formulations. They have ignored the reactive power losses which are key in the operation of power systems. In modern practical power systems reactive power injection plays a critical role in voltage stability control, thus the reactive power losses need to be incorporated in optimizing DG allocation for voltage profile improvement. The results of the few works which have considered reactive power losses in their optimization can be improved by using more recent and accurate algorithms. This research work aimed at solving this problem by proposing a hybrid of GA and IPSO to optimize DG location and size while considering both real and reactive power losses. Both real and reactive power flow and power loss sensitivity factors were utilized in identifying the candidate buses for DG allocation. This reduced the search space for the algorithm and thus increased its rate of convergence. The suggested method was programmed under MATLAB 2011 software and tested using IEEE 30-bus test system, IEEE 33-bus test system and IEEE 57-bus test system by considering three types of DGs. The results obtained were compared to those obtained by other researchers. It was observed that GAIPSO method performed better in terms of reducing both real and reactive power losses as compared to Heuristic, GA, PSO and IPSO methods. For the IEEE 30-bus test system, the percentage reduction in real power loss was 35.46%, 35.82% and 35.21% while the percentage reduction in reactive power loss was 36.01%, 35.95% and 35.88% for type 1, type 2 and type 3 DGs respectively. The voltage profile of the networks after optimizing DG locations and sizes using GA-IPSO method were also found to be much improved with the lowest bus voltage improved to 1.01pu and 0.959pu for the IEEE 30-bus and 33-bus test systems respectively. The effects of DG penetration on system power losses and voltage profiles were studied. The system power losses reduced with the introduction of DGs in the network up to an optimal number where any further DG inclusion resulted to an increase in system power losses and deviation of bus voltages outside acceptable limits.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/76250
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
    Collections
    • Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment & Design (FEng / FBD) [1552]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback