• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Are noun class markers in kiswahili really such a learning difficulty? A study of the use of noun class markers by pupils of the busibi primary school in Kenya

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Abstract (199.4Kb)
    Full-text (434.4Kb)
    Date
    2010
    Author
    Makokha, Walter O
    Type
    Article; en_US
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to establish the extent to which the StandardSeven pupils of the Busibi Primary School in the Samia District in western Kenya would misuse the pairs of noun class markers A-WA-, LI-YA-, KI-VI-, IZI- and U-ZI- in their written Kiswahili. A sample of thirty pupils was used in the study. A grammar test consisting of nineteen sentences containing a total of forty mistakes was used. The respondents were required to write the correct version of each sentence in the spaces provided on the questionnaire. The study tested the hypothesis that the respondents would make over 50% mistakes for each of the five pairs of noun class markers. The hypothesis was based on the widespread belief, but yet to be tested, among users of Kiswahili in Kenya that the five pairs are a source of great difficulty in achieving agreement between them and the nouns they refer to. So, the study assumed that the difficulty would definitely manifest itself in the Kiswahili of primary school pupils, especially those from an area of Kenya far away from the main towns where Kiswahili is used on a daily basis. However, the results did not support the hypothesis. The highest number of noncorrected mistakes made was actually only 41%. The average was just 31%. These unexpected results may have to do with the type of test used.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/76856
    https://linguistics.uonbi.ac.ke/basic-page/university-nairobi-journal-linguistics-and-languages
    Citation
    The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 1 (2010), 32-47
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
    Subject
    University of Nairobi Journal of Linguistics and Languages
    Collections
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM) [6704]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback