• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Assessment of neonatal care in clinical training facilities in Kenya.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (604.1Kb)
    Date
    2015-01
    Author
    Aluvaala, J
    Nyamai, R
    Were, F
    Wasunna, A
    Kosgei, R
    Karumbi, J
    Gathara, D
    English, M
    SIRCLE/Ministry of Health Hospital Survey Group.
    Type
    Article; en_US
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Objective An audit of neonatal care services provided by clinical training centres was undertaken to identify areas requiring improvement as part of wider efforts to improve newborn survival in Kenya. Design Cross-sectional study using indicators based on prior work in Kenya. Statistical analyses were descriptive with adjustment for clustering of data. Setting Neonatal units of 22 public hospitals. Patients Neonates aged <7 days. Main outcome measures Quality of care was assessed in terms of availability of basic resources (principally equipment and drugs) and audit of case records for documentation of patient assessment and treatment at admission. Results All hospitals had oxygen, 19/22 had resuscitation and phototherapy equipment, but some key resources were missing—for example kangaroo care was available in 14/22. Out of 1249 records, 56.9% (95% CI 36.2% to 77.6%) had a standard neonatal admission form. A median score of 0 out of 3 for symptoms of severe illness (IQR 0–3) and a median score of 6 out of 8 for signs of severe illness (IQR 4–7) were documented. Maternal HIV status was documented in 674/1249 (54%, 95% CI 41.9% to 66.1%) cases. Drug doses exceeded recommendations by >20% in prescriptions for penicillin (11.6%, 95% CI 3.4% to 32.8%) and gentamicin (18.5%, 95% CI 13.4% to 25%), respectively. Conclusions Basic resources are generally available, but there are deficiencies in key areas. Poor documentation limits the use of routine data for quality improvement. Significant opportunities exist for improvement in service delivery and adherence to guidelines in hospitals providing professional training.
    URI
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25138104
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/79310
    Citation
    Arch Dis Child. 2015 Jan;100(1):42-7.
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences (FHS) [10417]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback