Kenya Action Programme
Abstract
This report presents the Action Program requirement for
USAID/Kenya.
The team reviewed the natural resource base (water, soils,
animal and plant) and prepared a NRM Action Program on the basis of
priorities expressed by GOK officials, project people in the field,
other donors and NGOs, and USAID/Kenya.
The team also reviewed international, national, local,
economic, cultural, and institutional influences on natural
resource management. "Bottlenecks" were highlighted, such as
fragmentation of responsibilities among too many divisions of the
GOK; a "brain drain" of talent from the public to the private
sector; an inability to enforce specific NRM laws at a local level;
the possibility of the GOK becoming overwhelmed by a rapid influx
of fragmented natural resources aid; and the lack of means to carry
out natural resource management tasks.
The team then developed specific strategies for four priority
areas
--Tsavo West and Lake Nakuru National Parks, Masai Mara
Wildlife Reserve, and the Tana
River Primate Research Center -which were identified as "niches" where USAID/Kenya could make significant contributions; i.e., where other donors,
NGOs or GOK
are relatively inactive. The activities proposed for these four
areas enccmpass nearly all of the Bureau's
A.I.D. Plan for
Natural Resources Management (PNRM) priority concerns of forestry,
agroforestry and soil conservation, wildlife and extension
and
training.
The Tsavo West National Park strategy included a strong
emphasis on the restoration of the Park infrastructure and fleet of
vehicles, training of additional assistant park wardens, extension
to Masai herders adjacent to the park, and the provision of long
term technical assistance to work with the Masai to
foster tourism
development outside the park for the economic benefit of the Masai.
In the Masai Mara Wildlife Reserve, the emphasis was placed on
extension and training of the Masai the
adjacent to park with
a
view to reducing the wildlife/cattle grazing conflicts on the group
ranches outside the reserve, to prevent further subdivision of the
group ranches into smaller, fenced mini-ranches, and to teach how
wildlife and tourism can economically benefit the Masai directly.
The emphasis in the Lake Nakuru National Park
was on promoting
agroforestry and soil conservation practices
in the watershed
encircling the park through extension and training
to prevent
further siltation into Lake Nakuru
--an important and unique
flamingo sanctuary. The Tana River Primate Research
Center
strategy emphasized institutional strengthening including long term
training for Kenyan scientists, and other financial support of the
institution.
vi
Order-of-magnitude investment requirements were developed for each of the strategy components covering a 20-year period. The attainment of sustained management of the natural resource base is not instantaneous, but achievable only over a relatively long time period. The approach taken was to estimate the approximate costs of each strategy component and divide them between the three major investors --the donor, the GOK and, for the Nakuru agroforestry strategy, the farmers. The donor "primes the pump" by making the initial investments which are then phased into GOK recurrent cost obligations. The farmers who will receive training and extension in agroforestry and improved farming techniques will be expected to invest their time cash on the proposed land improvement schemes.
The present value of the (order-of-magnitude) investment
requirements
were
$2.3
and
$1.3
million
for
the
dono:
and
GOK
respectively
for
the
Tsavo
strategy.
The
major portion
of
the
anticipated
donor
contribution
in
this
strategy
was
for
the
renovation of the park infrastructure and tie provision of a fleet
of vehicles. The present values for the Lake Nakuru strategy was
estimated at roughly $350,000 for the donor and nearly $200,000 for
the GOK. The Marai Masa strategy will cost the donor nearly
$900,000 and the GOK $360,000. The Tana River Primate Research
Center will require funding of approximately $690,000 over a five
year period. (The GOK investment requirement was not estimated).
Citation
Christophersen, K. A., & Michieka, R. W. (1989). KENYA ACTION PROGRAM.Publisher
University of Nairobi
Collections
- Reports [373]