• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Journal Articles
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Commercial and subsistence Farming: What is the future for smallholder Kenyan agriculture?

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2003
    Author
    Nyikai, RA
    Type
    Article; en_US
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    Smallholders in Kenya have traditionally made important contributions to food security by producing most of their own food. They are, however, resource poor and, therefore, produce below optimum. In addition, the challenges of globalisation and liberalisation increasingly require that producers compete in the markets, both local and international. This proposes commercialisation of agriculture, even in the small farms. The objective function of the commercial farmer is profit maximization while that of the subsistence farmer is producing food for the family. That of the semi-commercial farmer is profit maximization subject to withholding enough resources for use in subsistence production. Farmers are known to be supply responsive and are, therefore, expected to adopt commercial agriculture, but many smallholders have continued in their semi-commercial and subsistence modes. This article builds on previous research by hypothesising key pathways by which the objective function and resource regimes may affect total output, using the case of smallholder farmers in Kenya. The data used is from a survey of 238 smallholder farm households between 1995 and 1996. Analysis is based on comparing values of output under different objective functions and resource regimes, and assessing their reality and viability. Results confirm that the monatory value of commercial agriculture is significantly higher than that of semicommercial agriculture. The reality, however, is that most smallholders are semi-commercial (or semi-subsistence) farmers. Farm investment analysis is carried out to assess the viability of increasing non-land resources. The Results indicate economic viability in very few cases. Results of a risk analysis indicate that risk averse farmers will put more effort in food production than will less risk averse ones. The study acknowledges the potential significance of commercial agriculture and the indispensability of subsistence agriculture in smallholder circumstances. Smallholder farms could be made to prosper in the future by enhancing food sovereignty and improving markets of non-food commodities.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/88613
    Citation
    African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, Vol. 6. 591-596
    Publisher
    African Crop Science Society
    Subject
    Objective function
    Risk analysis
    Food security
    Collections
    • Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary Medicine (FAg / FVM) [5481]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback