• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Law, Business Mgt (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Law, Business Mgt (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Public participation in the selection of public officers: a critical analysis of the mechanisms under the leadership & integrity act, 2012

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Full text (931.3Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Nyotah, Priscah Wamucii
    Type
    Thesis; en_US
    Language
    en
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    In Kenya public participation is one of the values and principles of governance provided for under Article 10 of the Constitution. These values and principles are binding on the State and every other person whenever they, among other things, interpret or enact any law. Article 73(2)(a) of the Constitution provides for criteria for selection of public officers which is that all public officers must be selected on the basis of their personal integrity, competence and suitability. This criterion requires participation of the public for purposes of gathering information to confirm that candidates to public offices comply with it. For the participation to be meaningful, it requires a guiding legal framework. In Kenya, that guiding framework is the Leadership & Integrity Act, 2012 (L&IA). Although the L&IA exists, there are still challenges that affect public participation during the selection of public officers. This is as shown in the Background section of this study. It appears that the L&IA does not facilitate meaningful public participation. The objective of the study therefore is to analyse the provisions of the L&IA with a view to establishing whether it facilitates public participation in any way, identify any existing gaps and also make recommendations for improvement. Chapter 2 of this study aims at creating an understanding as to what public participation entails. Chapter 3 contains an in-depth analysis of the provisions of the L&IA which brings out provisions which are facilitative of public participation and the gaps. Internationally, there are some best practices which have useful lessons and which have been used in making the recommendations. These are outlined in Chapter 4. Overall, the study concludes that indeed, there are some few provisions which can facilitate public participation in the selection of public officers. However, there are also numerous gaps. The study makes recommendations as to how those gaps can be addressed. This is seen in Chapter 5.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11295/90180
    Citation
    MASTER OF LAWS
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi
    Collections
    • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, Law, Business Mgt (FoA&SS / FoL / FBM) [24587]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback