Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRizk, DE
dc.contributor.authorNsanze, H
dc.contributor.authorMabrouk, MH
dc.contributor.authorMustafa, N
dc.contributor.authorThomas, L
dc.contributor.authorKumar, M
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-10T14:26:36Z
dc.date.available2013-06-10T14:26:36Z
dc.date.issued1998-06
dc.identifier.citationnt J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Jun;61(3):245-51.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9688485
dc.identifier.urihttp://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/30988
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To test the value of using prophylactic antibiotics at elective cesarean delivery. METHOD: One-hundred and twenty women delivered by elective cesarean in the absence of labor and before the rupture of membranes were randomized to receive either 1.5 g of cefuroxime intravenously at cord clamping (n = 59) or no prophylaxis (control group, n = 61). RESULTS: Twelve women developed febrile morbidity (six study, six control, P = 0.09). Of these, five had endometritis (two study, three control, P = 0.09) and two had wound infection (one study, one control, P = 0.09). Ten more women had microbiological evidence of endometritis and wound infection (six study, four control, P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in the hospital stay (6.5 days study, 6.8 days control, P = 0.06). Staphylococcus aureus was the commonest pathogen accounting for 14 infection episodes. Amniotic fluid culture could not predict the development of infection. CONCLUSION: Administration of prophylactic antibiotics at elective cesarean deliveries was not associated with decreased postoperative morbidity.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Nairobi.en
dc.titleSystemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean delivery.en
dc.typeArticleen
local.publisherDepartment of Medicineen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record