• Login
    • Login
    Advanced Search
    View Item 
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Education (FEd)
    • View Item
    •   UoN Digital Repository Home
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • Faculty of Education (FEd)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Factors influencing male participation in community-based microfinance programs: a case study of Catholic Relief Service in Rachuonyo and Malindi districts

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2011
    Author
    Nakinai, Margaret M.
    Type
    Thesis
    Language
    en_US
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    The purpose of this study was to examine factors that influence male participation in community managed micro finance programs in Malindi and Rachuonyo Disctricts. The objectives of this study were; to investigate the extent to which institutional strategies influence male participation in community managed micro finance programs; to determine how socio-cultural values influence male participation in community managed microfinance groups; and to determine the effect of formal financial services on male participation in community managed microfinance. The research study employed a descriptive survey research that used multistage and random sampling methodology with the sampling frame being constructed from the CRS' database on Savings and Internal Lending Communities (SILC) in Rachuonyo and Malindi districts. The sample size was made up of 384 individuals drawn from 192 SILC groups, the target population was 1906 SILC groups comprising of 32205 members. Data collection was administered using questionnaires and individual in-depth interviews. Secondary data was gathered from literature review. Raw data was coded and analysed through SPSS. The study findings indicate that institutional strategies have an influence on male participation with the following revelations: The SILC training needs to be repackaged to encourage male participation since the study revealed that men had other commitments; the training duration was too long and lastly that men were represented by their spouses in SILC groups. The study shows that men prefer larger social fund and savings contribution and larger loan disbursement. As for social funds, it was reported that men don't like sharing problems, they have alternative insurance schemes and that preempting emergency is forbidden. The loan duration was termed as being short and the interest (riba) being against the Koran and that it was high. It is evident that men felt the current groups were dominated by females and therefore had a preference for homogeneous groups and that Islam forbade mixing females and males. The study confirms that social cultural values influences male participation. Based on the findings of the study it was recommended that: Policy makers and relevant Government ministries and civil society should deliberately lobby and advocate for gender inclusivity in rural finance programs; Institutions implementing CMMF need to repackage SILC to make it attractive to male participants. Prior to project implementation, feasibility studies on 'likely effects of socio cultural values on projects' should be carried out and integrated in projects. CMMF should consider linking with institutions providing external funding to boost loan fund and benefit from other aspects such as safe custody for members' cash.
    URI
    http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke:8080/handle/123456789/4223
    Publisher
    University of Nairobi, Kenya
    Collections
    • Faculty of Education (FEd) [6064]

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback

     

     

    Useful Links
    UON HomeLibrary HomeKLISC

    Browse

    All of UoN Digital RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © 2022 
    University of Nairobi Library
    Contact Us | Send Feedback